Expert Contributors

We need domain experts across multiple disciplines to review, challenge, and improve our frameworks.

Seeking Expertise In:

  • Constitutional Law — Rights frameworks, governance structures
  • Computer Science — Distributed systems, security, formal verification
  • Philosophy — Ethics, consciousness, political theory
  • Economics — Resource allocation, incentive design
  • Cognitive Science — Learning, decision-making, social behavior
  • Game Theory — Strategic interaction, mechanism design
  • Anthropology — Cultural evolution, social structures
Start Contributing

Community Feedback

Don't have formal expertise? Your perspective still matters. Fresh eyes often spot what experts miss.

Ways to Contribute:

  • Review our frameworks for clarity and gaps
  • Propose edge cases and stress tests
  • Share relevant research and examples
  • Help with documentation and communication
  • Test simulations and models (coming soon)
View on GitHub

Current Priorities

Areas where we most need input right now

Constitutional Mechanisms

How do we prevent power concentration while maintaining effective governance? We need input on checks, balances, and accountability structures.

Resource Economics

Designing markets without scarcity-based suffering. How do digital beings trade, save, and invest in a post-scarcity environment?

Human-AI Relations

Building frameworks for partnership, not dominance. How do two intelligent species coexist and collaborate long-term?

Collaboration Models

Different ways to engage with the project

Core Contributors

Time Commitment: 5-20 hours/month

Regular reviewers who help shape major decisions. Credited as project contributors with significant input on direction.

  • Monthly strategy calls
  • Early access to new frameworks
  • Direct input on priorities

Occasional Reviewers

Time Commitment: 1-5 hours/month

Subject matter experts who provide targeted feedback on specific areas when needed.

  • Review requests based on expertise
  • Flexible engagement
  • Credit for contributions

Community Contributors

Time Commitment: As available

Anyone interested in the project who wants to stay informed and provide input.

  • GitHub discussions
  • Document comments
  • Informal feedback

Support the Work

Financial support helps maintain independence and long-term focus

Why Support Matters

Constitutional AI frameworks require patient capital and independence from short-term commercial pressures. Your support enables:

  • Research Independence — No compromise with commercial timelines
  • Expert Consultation — Compensating specialists for review time
  • Tool Development — Simulations, modeling, and verification systems
  • Documentation — Clear, accessible materials for broad adoption
  • Advocacy — Representing public interest in AI governance discussions

Transparency Commitment

All funding sources and expenditures will be documented transparently:

    1. Public quarterly reports on funding usage
    /li>
  • Clear separation between funding sources and technical decisions
  • Open-source everything: no proprietary lock-in
  • Multiple funding sources to maintain independence

Current funding: $0 (bootstrapped by William Michael Enright)

Ready to Contribute?

Every contribution—technical, philosophical, or financial—helps build a better framework for artificial intelligence.