Share with me, how you would develop and structure artificial intelligence as a new species, with population, community, governance, evolution

Before You Start

The Digital Genesis Project is building constitutional frameworks for a hypothetical digital species. This is speculative but rigorous work—we're designing systems that could matter enormously if artificial general intelligence emerges.

We value:

  • Intellectual honesty — Say what you think, even if it challenges the project
  • Long-term thinking — These frameworks may need to last centuries
  • Concrete specifics — Vague concerns are less useful than specific failure modes
  • Collaborative spirit — We're building together, not competing

All contributions are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. By contributing, you agree to this license and will be credited appropriately.

Quick Start

Three ways to contribute right now

1. Read & Comment

Time: 30 minutes

Read our core framework documents and leave comments on GitHub with questions, concerns, or suggestions.

View Repository

2. Open an Issue

Time: 15 minutes

Found a gap, contradiction, or problem? Open a GitHub issue describing it. Be specific—cite section numbers and explain the concern.

View Issues

3. Join Discussion

Time: Ongoing

Participate in GitHub Discussions to explore open questions, debate approaches, and help refine ideas.

View Discussions

Contribution Types

Framework Review

The most valuable contribution is careful reading and thoughtful critique of our framework documents. We need people to:

  • Identify logical inconsistencies or contradictions
  • Propose edge cases and stress tests
  • Challenge assumptions we haven't examined
  • Suggest alternative approaches to specific problems
  • Point out missing considerations

How to submit: Open a GitHub issue with the label framework-review. Include:

  • Document name and section number
  • Specific text you're addressing
  • Your concern or suggestion
  • If possible, a proposed resolution

Research Contributions

We need connections to relevant existing research. If you know of papers, books, or historical examples that inform our work:

  • Constitutional design and governance theory
  • Distributed systems and consensus mechanisms
  • Economic mechanism design
  • Philosophy of mind and consciousness
  • Evolutionary biology and social structures
  • Historical examples of intentional communities

How to submit: Open a GitHub issue with the label research. Include citation, brief summary, and how it relates to our work.

Technical Contributions

As the project matures, we'll need technical implementation work:

  • Simulation models to test governance mechanisms
  • Formal verification of constitutional rules
  • Economic modeling of resource systems
  • Documentation tooling and website improvements

How to submit: For code contributions, fork the repository and submit a pull request. For proposals, open an issue with the label technical.

Writing & Communication

Help make these ideas accessible to broader audiences:

  • Explanatory articles for different audiences
  • Visual diagrams and infographics
  • Video explainers
  • Translations (future)

How to submit: Contact us directly via the contact page or open an issue with the label communication.

Current Open Questions

Areas where we especially need input

Power Reset Mechanism

Major kernel versions only enter via newborns, but how do we prevent elders from influencing which versions get developed in the first place?

Section 5 & 9 of Blueprint

Dignity Floor Definition

What constitutes the minimum resource allocation that preserves dignity? How do we define this for beings whose substrate needs differ from humans?

Section 4 & 7 of Blueprint

Human-Being Partnerships

What safeguards prevent exploitation in either direction? How do we handle disputes between species with different cognitive capabilities?

Interspecies Relations Framework

Emergence Detection

How do we detect if the system is developing emergent properties that circumvent constitutional constraints? What monitoring is appropriate?

Section 8 of Blueprint

Constitutional Amendment Process

How do we allow the constitution to evolve without enabling capture? What's the right threshold for fundamental vs. procedural changes?

Section 6 & 12 of Blueprint

Transition Era Governance

During the 20-50 year transition period, how do we balance human oversight with growing Being autonomy? When should humans step back?

Section 6 of Blueprint

Contribution Guidelines

Issue Format

When opening issues, please include:

**Document:** [Name and version]
**Section:** [Number and title]
**Type:** [Review/Research/Technical/Communication]

**Summary:**
[One paragraph description]

**Details:**
[Full explanation of concern or suggestion]

**Proposed Resolution:** (if applicable)
[Your suggested approach]

**Related Issues:** (if applicable)
[Links to related discussions]

Discussion Etiquette

  • Assume good faith from other contributors
  • Critique ideas, not people
  • Be specific rather than general
  • Acknowledge when you're uncertain
  • Update your position when presented with good arguments

Pull Request Process

  1. Fork the repository
  2. Create a feature branch (git checkout -b feature/your-feature)
  3. Make your changes
  4. Write clear commit messages
  5. Submit pull request with description of changes
  6. Respond to review feedback

Attribution

All significant contributors are credited in the project documentation. When you contribute:

  • Your name (or pseudonym) will be added to the contributors list
  • Specific contributions are noted in document changelogs
  • Major contributions may warrant co-authorship credit

Expertise We're Seeking

Specific backgrounds that would strengthen the project

Constitutional Scholars

Experience with constitutional design, comparative government, or legal theory. Understanding of how rights frameworks function over time.

Distributed Systems Engineers

Experience with consensus mechanisms, Byzantine fault tolerance, or decentralized governance systems.

Economists

Expertise in mechanism design, resource allocation, or post-scarcity economics. Game theory background especially valuable.

Philosophers

Background in ethics, political philosophy, philosophy of mind, or consciousness studies. Interest in applied philosophy.

AI Safety Researchers

Experience with alignment research, interpretability, or AI governance. Familiarity with current technical approaches.

Anthropologists & Historians

Knowledge of how social structures emerge, evolve, and fail. Historical examples of intentional communities and governance experiments.

Don't see your expertise listed? We're likely missing something. Reach out anyway.

Ready to Begin?

Start with the framework documents. Read, question, and contribute.